Talk with your students about the peer review process

Office of extramural research, National Institutes of Health
This page offers numerous links to peer review news, guidelines, practices, and documents.

Peer review sessions may direct students to be supportive and encouraging to one another

The point is that many human emotions, including nepotism, professional jealousies, methodological disagreements, and ideological biases go into the peer review process. It would be refreshing if we interpreted the “peer-reviewed” sign of approval as the flawed signal that it is, particularly in areas where there seems to be a larger narrative that must be served. The peer-review process may well be the worst way of advancing scientific knowledge—except for all the others.

Get feedback about peer-review exercises

Thank you for the informative article, it is very helpful to someone new to peer reviewing!

Step Three: Write a brief summary of the article and its contribution. When I am doing a peer review, I sometimes do it all in one sitting – which will take me about two hours – or I read it one day and write it the next. Often, I prefer to do the latter to give myself some time to think about the article and to process my thoughts. When writing a draft of the review, the first thing I do is summarize the article as best I can in three to four sentences. If I think favorably of the article and believe it should be published, I often will write a longer summary, and highlight the strengths of the article. Remember that even if you don’t have any (or very many) criticisms, you still need to write a review. Your critique and accolades may help convince the editor of the importance of the article. As you write up this summary, take into consideration the suitability of the article for the journal. If you are reviewing for the top journal in your field, for example, an article simply being factually correct and having a sound analysis is not enough for it to be published in that journal. Instead, it would need to change the way we think about some aspect of your field.

poetry homework helper Peer Review Essay dissertation ..

Reciprocal peer learning emphasizes students simultaneously learning and contributing to other students' learning. Such communication is based on mutual experience and so they are better able to make equal contributions. It more closely approximates to Habermas' notion of an 'ideal speech act' in which issues of power and domination are less prominent than when one party has a designated 'teaching' role and thus takes on a particular kind of authority for the duration of the activity.

Peer Review Essay peer review essay Peer Review Sample ..

The journal editors admitted the errors in the survey but nonetheless declined to publish the comment. Said Cohen of his inability to obtain the correction of a peer-reviewed article: “It’s just wrong that now the editors acknowledge there is something wrong in their journal—although we seem to disagree about how serious the problem is—but no one is going to formally notify the future readers of the article.”

The Importance of Peer Review Essay - 578 Words

Reciprocal peer learning typically involves students within a given class or cohort. This makes peer learning relatively easy to organize because there are fewer timetabling problems. There is also no need to pay or reward with credit the more experienced students responsible for peer teaching. Students in reciprocal peer learning are by definition peers, and so there is less confusion about roles compared with situations in which one of the 'peers' is a senior student, or is in an advanced class, or has special expertise.

Getting & Giving Feedback: The Peer Review – …

The problems with peer review are not unique to psychology, sociology, or the other social sciences. They bedevil medicine and natural science as well. John Ioannidis, of the Stanford Medical School, has opined that “most published research findings are false,” and Richard Horton, editor-in-chief of The Lancet—which is the U.K.’s leading medical journal—has cautioned that “much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue.”