Free government regulation Essays and Papers - …

The relationship between the U.S. government and the institution of marriage has been a long and complicated one. Originating as a religious institution backed by law, marriage has become a government institution that has shed much of its religious affiliations and instead shifted towards a principle of minimal government intrusion. The recent same-sex marriage debate has caused a backlash from traditional marriage supporters seeking to return to outdated policies of government regulation. However, the historical and societal flow concerning the institutionalization of marriage points in the other direction, towards deinstitutionalization. Americans should continue down this path, but with certain changes outlined in this article that would preserve and expand the rights given to family units. The best method to facilitate such change is the implementation of domestic partnership contracts. These contracts would distance the government from its current religious entanglement in marriage while also accounting for societal changes such as increasing acceptance of same-sex relationships. The institution of marriage, as it was originally intended to be in early America, no longer fits our modern society. It is therefore time for a change, and that change is a shift to domestic partnership contracts.

In this paper I will point out the common problems dealing with government regulation.

As can especially be seen in the current time of recession and bailouts, citizens rely on the government to regulate and stabilize of our economy - to act on behalf of their wellbeing.


Free government regulation papers, essays, and research papers.

Overall, government regulations play a big part in urban brownfield residential development.

During the 19th century, when the American economy became more industrialized, and grew to a world power, the federal government passed business laws, that favored social reforms over the interests of big business.


should government regulate food - Essay by Jboogurlc

So made Roosevelt’s “New Deal” legislation effectively the federal government the countries largest regulator of business and the economy, after the great depression in the 1930’s (U.S....

Government Regulation of Business: The Moral …

Throughout American history, the government transformed these religious and societal traditions into law, creating the field of marriage law. In addition, the 1888 Supreme Court case of Maynard v. Hill declared marriage to be “the foundation of the family and of society, without which there would be neither civilization nor progress” (211). However, I will demonstrate in the next section that more recently American society has called for these laws concerning marriage to diverge from some of their original religious and social impetuses. Many Americans believe that laws still serve as guidelines to communal living, but those guidelines should mirror the social era in a more secular nature, in order to reflect the widely accepted principle of “separation of church and state.” The arguments in favor of governmental oversight of marriage are no longer substantial enough to prevent the deregulation of marriage. In the following section, I will examine how marriage and government have disentangled themselves over the years in order to demonstrate that American laws concerning marriage are no longer logically sound enough to govern modern partnerships.

A+, Biblical Business and Government Regulation …

In addition, Ayotte stated that she has asked her Republican counterparts where they think they will get the votes to reach 60. She went on to say "We saw the movie in 2013, and I don’t think we should relive that movie. Let’s remember what happened when you shut the government down and you reopen it -- it costs you more money. So if you care about the fiscal state of the country, let’s not waste money shutting the government down with no result." One person who agrees is Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz) who said that a clean spending bill to keep the government open is the direction in which the Senate “ought to end up” moving.